搞报道时间稍长一点的通讯员大都掌握这样一个规律:短稿大都比长稿容易见报,短的报道所具有的优势比长的要多、要强、要大。道理大家都明白,那么为什么大多数通讯员实际写起稿子来却偏爱就长避短呢?我感觉,这里的原因很多。除了有通讯员片面认为,文章长短决定着典型的轻重,作者水平的高低,才有上头条和获奖机会,才有资格同别人比试外,来自单位领导的“压力”也是一个重要因素。我认识一个老通讯员,聊天中,他倒出了心里话儿:部队领导和编辑部,好象是两块夹板,一头说,“要写大稿、长稿,只有长稿才有宣传力,新闻价值 Most correspondents who reported for a longer period of time had a rule like this: most of the drafts were easier to read than the drafts, and the advantages of the shorter stories were more than those of the longer ones. They were stronger and larger. We all understand why, then why most correspondents actually write manuscripts but prefer to avoid weaknesses? I feel, here for many reasons. In addition to the one-sided view of the correspondent, the length of the article determines the typical severity, the level of the author, the headline and award-winning opportunity to be eligible for comparison with others, the “pressure” from the unit leadership is also an important factor. I know an old correspondent, chatting, he poured out my heart: children’s leadership and editorial department, it seems to be two splints, one said, "To write big draft, long draft, only the draft has propaganda, News value