本文对我市1994、1995年计免常规免疫接种报表进行了分析。结果显示，我市两年“四苗”报告接种率均达95％以上；农村卡介苗接种率明显低于城市。分别以市统计局及同年龄强化免疫人口数为基数，估算1994、1995年“四苗”实际接种率，该率明显低于报告接种率。由此提示我们报告接种率作为一项考核指标时，应考虑其是否准确、完整。 This article analyzes the routine immunization report of our city in 1994 and 1995. The results showed that in two years in our city, the “four seedlings” reported inoculation rates reached more than 95%; rural BCG vaccination rate was significantly lower than the city. Based on the statistics from the Municipal Bureau of Statistics and the population with the same age as the immunization population, the actual vaccination rates of “four seedlings” in 1994 and 1995 were estimated, which was obviously lower than the report vaccination rate. This prompts us to report the coverage of vaccination as an evaluation index, we should consider whether it is accurate and complete.