论文部分内容阅读
目的对腹腔镜阑尾切除术和开腹阑尾切除术这两种方法治疗阑尾炎的临床疗效进行对比分析。方法选取我院收治的68例阑尾炎患者，将他们随机分为观察组和对照组两组，每组34例，观察组实施腹腔镜阑尾切除术，对照组实施开腹阑尾切除术，对两组治疗效果进行分析对比。结果观察组与对照组这两组患者都有明显的临床疗效，但是观察组患者在手术时长、手术出血情况、术后排气的时间以及总的住院时长都比对照组要少，差异具有统计学意义(<0.05)。结论腹腔镜阑尾切除术相比于开腹阑尾切除术，对于治疗阑尾炎有着更明显的疗效，可以在临床上大力推广。“,”Objective Comparative analysis of the clinical ef ect of laparoscopic appendectomy andconventional appendectomy this two methods in the treatment of appendicitis. Methods We selected 68 cases of appendicitis patients in our hospital, they were dividedinto observation group and control group two groups, 34 cases in each group, the observation group of laparoscopic appendectomy, the control group to implement the open appendectomy, through analysis and comparison of the therapeutic ef ect of two groups. Results The observation group and the control group, the two groups of patients haveobvious clinical curative ef ect, but the observation group patients in the operationtime, operation time, bleeding exhaust situation after surgery and total hospitalization duration less than the control group, with significant dif erence ( <0.05). Conclusion Laparoscopic appendectomy compared with open appendectomy, has a more obvious ef ect for the treatment of appendicitis, can be popularized in clinic.