本文将张湛《列子注》与《列子》原文认真加以对照，从大量例证中，看出张湛在《列子注》中所体现的思想与《列子》原文的思想差别很大；有的注文与原文没有丝毫关系甚至截然相反。张湛《列子注》《列子》原文在义理上即在思想上有这样大的矛盾，这是《列子》书不是张湛所伪造的强有力的内证。 In this paper, Zhang Zhan’s “Liezhiban” and “Liezizi” seriously compared with the original, from a large number of examples, we can see that Zhangzhan’s thought in Liezhiban differs greatly from the idea of ​​Liezai. Some notes There is no difference or even the opposite of the original. Zhang Zhan “Liezi Note” “Liezi” The original text in the sense that there is such a big contradiction in ideology, which is “Liezi” book is not a powerful internal evidence faked by Zhang Zhan.