论文部分内容阅读
涓生和子君爱情悲剧的成因从《伤逝》出世之日就聚讼纷纭。鲁迅先生的深刻使得这一常见的爱情事件具有了似乎无限阐释的可能性:“封建礼教强大说”、“个性解放思想局限说”、“知识分子缺陷说”、“性别冲突说”、“中西文化冲突说”。这些解释都从一个侧面接触到了这一爱情事件的本质。在我看来,这一事件的主要推动者涓生的行动完全是按照1920年代现代性爱观的原则实施的。因此,作为1920年代启蒙理性的重要内涵,现代性爱观中蕴涵的启蒙的知识学内在矛盾是这一爱情悲剧出现的重要内因。
The causes of the tragedy of Juansheng and Zi-jun differ from the date of the birth of “Moses”. Mr. Lu Xun’s profoundness has made this common love incident appear to have the possibility of infinite interpretation: “strong feudal ethics,” “personality emancipation of the mind,” “intellectual flaws,” “ Gender conflict said ”, “ Chinese and Western cultural conflict ”. All of these explanations come into contact with the essence of this love incident from one aspect. In my opinion, Juansheng’s action, the main promoter of this incident, is entirely based on the principles of the modern sexual outlook of the 1920s. Therefore, as an important connotation of enlightenment rationality in the 1920s, the inherent contradictions of enlightenment in knowledge of the modern concept of love are the important internal causes of this love tragedy.