《婚姻法司法解释(三)》下称《解释三》实施近两年来,由于该解释本身的问题和各地基层法院、法官对立法本意及条文认识的不一致,同时各地高院也没有对具体适用作明确的解答与意见,不仅使法律实践人对《解释三》的认识和基层法院在审理具体案件时更加困惑,也对司法尊严带来一定的损害。案例一:难以主张的婚内子女抚养费(解释第3条) In the recent two years since the implementation of the “Interpretation III” of the Marriage Law, due to the problems of the interpretation itself and the inconsistencies in the understanding of the legislative intent and the provisions of the articles by grass-roots courts and judges in various places, Clear answers and opinions not only make the legal practitioners’ understanding of “Interpretation III” more confusing with the grassroots courts in handling specific cases, but also bring some damage to the judicial dignity. Case 1: Difficult to advocate marriage child support (explained Article 3)