论文部分内容阅读
我们是带着掉眼泪的准备去看影片《特急警报333》的,因为电视台和报纸对它宣传得很起劲,它还获了奖。可是眼泪却没掉下来。不客气地说:从感染力来看,它还远不如三年前问世的《蓝光闪过之后》。是影片的主题不够积极昂扬吗?当然不是。是它在艺术表现上过于粗糙了。首先,作品缺少一个贯穿全剧的中心冲突。是否需要全城大转移这一冲突只能统领影片的后半部。前半部的东一笔、西一笔虽说也热热闹闹,但却破碎松散,无法凝成环环相扣相生的悬念。开场大半,冲突还集中不起来,观众也就随波逐流,心猿意马了。其次,影片赋予人物形象的动作行为多与人物身份不合。如果我们让一个钢铁公司经理去抡锤打铁挂马掌,或者让一个将军代替董存瑞去堵机枪眼,大家一定会大摇其头。那么,有什么理由让县委书记或县长
We were prepared to look at the film “Urgent Alert 333” with tearful tears, as television and newspapers were very proud of it and won the prize. But tears did not fall. You’re welcome to say: From the point of view of contagion, it is far less than the “blue light flashed” that came out three years ago. Is the theme of the film not positive enough? Surely not. It is too rough in artistic expression. First, the work lacks a central conflict that runs through the play. The need to transfer the city’s big conflict can only lead the latter half of the film. The first half of the East, West, though a penny also bustling, but broken loose, unable to condense interlocking suspense. Most of the opening, the conflict can not be concentrated, the audience will drift, distracted. Second, the action given to the character by the movie is often incompatible with the identity of the character. If we allow a steel manager to slash iron horseshoes, or a general instead of Dong Cunrui to plug the machine gun eyes, we will shake their heads. So, what are the reasons for county clerks or county magistrates?