论文部分内容阅读
秦锡田(1861—1940)江苏省上海县陈行乡(今上海市闵行区浦江镇陈行集镇)人。1914—1935年先后分纂、总纂、总阅民国《上海县续志》、民国《南汇县续志》、民国《上海县志》。在编纂实践中形成“前志无撼则当其所有,前志有缺则当补其无”。所用资料注明出处,设“遗补”目,补前志之缺,设“考证”目、纠前志之误等志法。提出“修志之难,不在于纂辑,而在于采访”的资料第一观点。纂修者应有“谙悉体例、兼擅史才、勤于咨询,熟悉掌故”的才华。秦锡田是民国时期上海知名的史志学者,纂修实践值得志界探究,修志方法与观念具有现实借鉴意义。
Qin Xitian (1861-1940) Chenxing Township, Shanghai County, Jiangsu Province (now Chenhang Town, Pujiang Town, Minhang District, Shanghai). From 1914 to 1935, it was divided into four parts: the first compilation and the second compilation; the first one was the reexamination of Shanghai County by the Republic of China; the second revaluation of Nanhui County by the Republic of China; the second edition of Shanghai County by the Republic of China. In the compilation of practice to form “before the unwilling to shake when all its own, there is no lack of pre-Chi when it fill ”. The data used indicate the source, set “left ” head, make up the lack of prequel, set “textual research ” head, prejudice the error and other volunteers. Proposed “The difficulty of revision, not in compiling, but rather in the interview ” information first point of view. Compilers should have “Familiar with the system, and good at history, diligent in consulting, familiar with the story ” talent. Qin Xitian is a well-known historian and scholar in Shanghai during the Republic of China. It is of practical significance to comprehend the practice worthy of the mind to explore, and to apply methods and concepts in his study.