论文部分内容阅读
次范畴化功能是人们依据名词所指事物的不同特征,对其进行下属切分的认知结果在语言中的反映,也是人类认识向精准方向发展的产物。英语限制性和非限制性关系分句的区别在于限制性关系分句对名词先行项具有次范畴化功能,而非限制性关系分句则没有。本文根据这一认知上的区别,分析了两类不同的关系分句与它们所修饰的先行项名词之间的相互制约关系。研究结果表明,本文从次范畴化角度对两类关系分句的区别进行的分析以及两类分句使用中选择的解释都是合理的并有说服力的。
The subcategorization function is a product of people’s cognition to the precise direction according to the different characteristics of the things that the nouns refer to and the cognitive results of their subordinate segmentation in the language. The difference between the English restrictive and non-restrictive relation clauses is that the restrictive relation clauses have the sub-categorization function on the noun precedent terms, but not the non-restrictive relation clauses. Based on this cognitive difference, this paper analyzes the relationship between two different types of relation clauses and the noun terms of their antecedents. The results show that this paper analyzes the differences between the two types of relational clauses from the perspective of subcategorization and the explanations of choice in the use of the two types of clauses are reasonable and convincing.