给家长的警示

来源 :阅读与作文(英语初中版) | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:BeginJava123
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
   Melissa Block (Host): Kids who play soccer should not head the ball before high school. That’s the recommendation from a new campaign that’s trying to educate parents, coaches and kids about the dangers of concussion and brain injury in soccer. The doctors behind the campaign say heading the ball before age 14 poses special risks to a child’s brain development. Helping to lead the campaign are 3 former members of the U.S. women’s national team that won the World Cup in 1999. Among them, Cindy Parlow Cone, who cited post-concussion syndrome when she retired from the game. She told me she still experiences fatigue and headaches, which she believes can be traced to years and years of heading the ball, starting at a really early age.
   Cindy Parlow Cone: Well, I started playing soccer when I was about three years old because my older siblings played it, and I wanted to do everything that they were doing. As soon as you started playing soccer you started learning how to head the ball, and so by the time I reached 14 I’d probably headed the ball over a thousand times already.
  Melissa: Really? And did you notice any effects when you were that little?
  Cindy: I remember seeing stars every once in a while when I’d head the ball, but I never really thought much of it. I mean obviously I know now that that is not normal—to see stars, and that’s a minor concussion.
  Melissa: I wonder if you’ve talked to doctors who have said, yeah, we’re pretty sure that your experience in youth soccer contributed to what you’re experiencing now.
  Cindy: Yeah, I mean we didn’t know better when I was growing up, but now we do. And I think when you know better you have to do better, and we have a responsibility to all the youth kids out there playing soccer to try to make the sport as safe as possible for them. I’m a youth soccer coach, and I will be talking with the kids that I’m coaching about, you know—there’s…we’re not going to practise heading. I coach 11 and 12-year-olds right now, and there’s no need for them to be heading the soccer ball yet. We’ll focus on other technical and tactical skills associated—that are developmentally appropriate for them.
   Melissa: Do you get pushback from parents, because I know from being on the sidelines of lots of youth soccer games that anytime a kid heads the ball, the parents go crazy—hey, that’s great. And I would imagine, you know, if you’re telling your kids not to do it, you might get parent saying we’re going to lose. We’re going to be noncompetitive.    Cindy: Well, I think that’s something that we have to communicate well with parents. At the forefront of this is to keep their kids safe, which I don’t know a parent out there that doesn’t want to keep their kid safe. So if this means delaying heading until they’re in high school and 14 years of age, then that’s what it means. And I think that’s why this is so important is just during those developmental years, we’re not having them constantly hit the ball with their heads. That repetition is not good for that age group, and they need to wait a little bit longer.
  Melissa: I’m curious. When you’re coaching youth soccer, what do you tell a parent if he or she comes to you and asks, you know, why can’t my kid had the ball at age 10, 11, 12? What do you tell them?
  Cindy: Well, I think in—first of all, until this campaign becomes the rule—that there is no heading in any of the leagues that these kids are playing in, I don’t think I can tell them not to head the ball. I can tell them that I’m not going to practise it in practice, and I can tell them that I’m not going to force them to head the ball in the games. If the ball comes to them in the game before the leagues change the rule and they head the ball, I’m not going to punish them in any sort of way. But just by eliminating the heading in practice and eliminating them feeling like they have to head the ball in the game, already, we’re decreasing the number of impacts they’re taking to the head.
   Melissa: Well, Cindy Parlow Cone, thanks so much for talking with us.
   Cindy: Thank you very much.
   梅丽莎·布洛克(主持人):踢足球的孩子在上高中前不该用头来顶球——这是一个新的运动所提出的建议。这个运动旨在让家长、教练和孩子们了解在踢足球的过程中会有脑震荡和脑损伤的危险。发起这次运动的医生说在14岁前用头顶球会给孩子的脑部发育带来特殊的风险。发起这次运动的是前美国女子国家足球队的三位队员,她们在1999年赢得了世界杯的冠军。她们之中的辛迪·帕洛·科恩退役后患上了脑震荡后综合征。她告诉我到现在她还是头晕头疼,而她相信这是因为她在很小的时候就开始年复一年的用头顶球。
   辛迪·帕洛·科恩:嗯,我在大约三岁的时候就开始踢足球,因为我的哥哥姐姐们都这么干,我想做一切他们正在做的事。你一开始学足球,就会开始学习头球。因此到我14岁的时候,可能已经练习了一千多次的头球了。
   梅丽莎:真的吗?那你在那么小的时候有注意到这样做有什么影响吗?
   辛迪:我记得练习头球的时候时常会眼冒金星,但是我真的从来没有多想此事。我意思是,我现在当然知道那是不正常的现象——眼冒金星,这是轻微脑震荡的(症状)。
   梅丽莎:我在想你有没有跟医生提起过此事,而医生有没有说:“嗯,我们很确定你青少年期间(练习头球)的经历导致了现在的症状。”
   辛迪:嗯,我的意思是在我成长的过程中我们并没有很了解此事,而现在我们很清楚了。我认为如果我们对(这一情况)更加了解,就应该做得更好。我们要对所有年幼就开始踢足球的孩子们负责,盡可能保证他们在这项运动中的安全。我现在是一名少年足球教练,我会和我的学生聊天。你知道的——我们不用练习头球。我现在正在训练11、12岁的孩子,他们还没有必要去练习头球。我们把精力放在其他相关的战术和技能上——这些很适合他们的发展。
   梅丽莎:你(这样做)受到过家长们的阻挠吗?因为我在球场边上看过许多少年足球的比赛,每当一个孩子用了头球,家长们都会为之疯狂——嘿,这太棒了。因此我认为,你知道的,如果你说你的孩子不要用头球,你就会听到家长们说:“我们肯定要输了,我们没有一点竞争力。”
   辛迪:好吧,我认为这就是我们必须要和家长沟通好的事。最关键的是保证他们孩子的安全,我想没有一个家长不希望自己的孩子是安全的。如果这意味着把练习头球推迟到他们上高中或14岁的时候,这就是其意义所在。我想这件事重要之处就在于在孩子们成长的阶段,我们不用让他们经常用头来顶球。这种反复性的动作对于这个年龄阶段的孩子是没有好处的,他们需要再等一段时间。
   梅丽莎:我很好奇,当你在教少年足球的时候,你知道的,如果家长们来问你:“为什么我的孩子不能在10、11、12岁练习头球?你此时会怎么跟他们说呢?
   辛迪:好吧,我想,首先,我不能命令他们不练习头球,直到这次的运动达成规定——规定任何足球俱乐部的孩子都不能练习头球。我可以告诉孩子们我不会在训练中练习头球,我也可以告诉他们我不会在比赛中强迫他们用头球。如果在俱乐部更改规定之前他们用了头球,我也不会处罚他们。但是通过减少他们在训练和比赛中用头球的次数,我们已经减少了对他们头部的影响。
   梅丽莎:好的,辛迪·帕洛·科恩,非常感谢你来到这里。
   辛迪:非常感谢你。
其他文献
For a long time, Chinese production has been synonymous with corner-cutting and cheap goods. Few Western luxury brands were willing to admit how much of their stock was manufactured there. However, th
内容提要 中国快速推进的工业化导致了巨大风险,在广大农村表现为“癌症村”增多对农民生命的剥夺。这形成了传媒视野中的环境风险,传媒为之不断的命名扩散了社会影响。但是传媒命名还存在很大的不足,其背后是体制机制的诸多阻力。这需要传媒加大对“癌症村”的命名力度,消除城乡差别,改进报道理念,完善环境风险议题的建构。  关键词 “癌症村” 环境风险 议题  [中图分类号]C913 [文献标识码]A [文章编号
内容提要 改革开放的40年(1978-2018)实质上是制度变迁的40年。中国从传统计划经济转向市场经济的过程是一个经济高速增长的过程,而高速增长的动力来源于制度变迁。我国制度变迁的中国特色主要表现为:中国的制度变迁并不根源于“华盛顿共识”;采用的是渐进的制度变迁方式;把自下而上的制度变迁与自上而下的制度变迁结合起来;从“权利限制准入秩序”向“权利开放准入秩序”转变。中国制度变迁的主要理论依据一直
内容提要 娼妓形象是中国城市文学中的经典形象。这类人寄居于都市边缘,最容易被掌控和撕裂,悲剧成了她们的宿命。1990年代以来,娼妓题材小说跳脱了传统传奇的窠臼,摆脱“痛感”叙事,转入现代悲剧的“无痛”书写。娼妓形象“痛感”消失,挣脱的主动性丧失,羞耻感消弭,施之于身的救赎渐趋无意义。人物形象的悲剧性背后隐现了城市文化的现代危机及其作家创作的“情色”动机。“正义”的介入几无可能,现世的快感消解了对“
内容提要 发轫于尼采的反常规之道,非传统“诱惑”颠覆了整个传统理性世界。经过维特根斯坦、海德格尔、拉康、福柯、德里达到鲍德里亚等操劳,非理性、非本质、非概念、非操持、非澄明、非等价、非自身、非秩序、非常规、非稳定、非真实、非连续的裂变,“诱惑”爆发出无限的能量。“诱惑”的万有引力使我们跌入“诱惑”的深渊,因为鲍德里亚明示我们“一切都是诱惑”。但立意于反现代性的后现代主义思想家们最终仍囿困于现代形而
3月12日,投资3.5亿元的陕西西安白鹿原民俗文化村正式启动拆除工作。从开业时单日接待游客量达到12万人次,到后来的门前冷落车马稀,再到停业整改半年后最终拆除,中间还不到4年时间。  与云南丽江大研古镇、浙江嘉兴乌镇等国内常年热门的古镇不同,一些打着民俗文化村旗号运营的特色景区以新建为主,没有具有年代感的建筑,更缺乏历史文化的积淀。除了新建一批仿古建筑,民俗文化村的一大通病就是项目开发缺乏创新。 
TA的成长:吴昕,中国电视节目主持人、演员。2016年曾获得风尚盛典“年度网友最爱新生力女明星”等奖项。“无论正在经历什么,过什么样的人生,或黯淡或精彩,都要在心里留块儿空间给自己,记得自己最初的样子。”  适用话题:坚强;乐观;迎难而上;勇敢  “我内心是个很强硬的人,我不喜欢别人说我不好,不喜欢别人质疑我,我喜欢勇敢面对挑战。”这是吴昕出道的第10个年头,站在T台上说的话。  此时的吴昕,大方
内容提要 施特劳斯与阿伦特均系流亡美国的德裔犹太哲人,作为犹太人的经历体验及其对犹太人问题的关注,构成了二者学术思考的理论起点和重要方面。但共同的身份认同和时代背景因素并没有拉近二者的思想距离:施特劳斯将目光瞄向前现代的中古犹太思想和柏拉图式的政治哲学,试图通过阅读和理解古人来找寻解决现代性危机的万能密钥;阿伦特则将目光放到当下,试图通过对现代社会历史进程中各种影响要素和相关事例的哲学反思得出对2
在20世纪西方马克思主义的多元形态中,影响最大且产生持续争鸣的莫过于人道主义马克思主义与结构主义马克思主义。二者均源于对马克思和恩格斯思想的继承,但却由于对马克思和恩格斯思想的关注点、所面对的社会现实状况,以及所回应和汲取的其他现代理论资源的差异,从而形成了具有人道主义和结构主义两种不同色彩的马克思主义理论形态。肖恩·克里文(Sean Creaven)认为,人道主义的马克思主义(Humanist
那些年里,父亲在老家种地,我们都还小。生活很贫穷,很简单。父亲终日挂念的,就是庄稼的收成。   入夏,一进入雨季,父亲就开始变得忧心忡忡。尽管,在雨季前,父亲已将所有的土地耘锄过了。可是,雨季一到来,父亲就又开始忧虑了。雨,一直下着,时大时小,断断续续,像一场场无赖的纠缠。乌云滚动在半空中,常常大半个月,天地就笼罩在雨雾之中。不能出门,田地里浸湿了水,更不能到田地里做农活。父亲的心中,阴云密