目的探讨我国积极心理学视域下的团体辅导对在校大学生主观幸福感的干预效果,为大学生的心理健康教育提供循证依据。方法以“幸福感”为检索词,在常用字段检索中国期刊全文数据库(CNKI)、万方数据库(WANFANG DATA)、维普中文科技期刊数据库(VIP)、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、人民大学书报资料中心《复印报刊资料》(RD)与中国社会科学引文数据库(CSSCI),以“well-being”or“happiness”or“blessedness”在常用字段(abstract、title and keywords)检索了英文数据库ISI web of science,Science Direct(Elsevier),Springer link and Google scholar,并且限定研究地区为“China”。从建库至2015年7月15日的我国团体辅导对在校大学生主观幸福感干预的随机对照试验。根据既定的纳入和排除标准筛选文献、提取资料、质量评价后,采用Revman 5.3软件与Stata软件进行Meta分析。结果共纳入12篇文献,708例被试,其中干预组336例,对照组372例。Meta分析结果显示,干预组主观幸福感即刻评分高于对照组(SMD=0.86,95%CI=0.71~1.02,P<0.01);干预组主观幸福感随访与即刻评分差异无统计学意义(SMD=-0.16,95%CI=-0.35~0.03,P=0.09)。敏感性分析显示,无单一研究对分析结果产生实质性影响。结论积极的团体辅导可以提高在校大学生主观幸福感,可为针对大学生群体开展积极团体辅导提供循证依据。 Objective To explore the effect of group counseling on the subjective well-being of undergraduates in the field of positive psychology in our country and to provide evidence-based evidence for the psychological health education of college students. Methods Using the term “happiness” as the search term, CNKI, WANFANG DATA, VIP, CBM (Chinese Biomedical Literature Database) Renmin University of China Library and Information Center “Copy Newspaper” (RD) and the Chinese Social Science Citation Database (CSSCI), “well-being” or “happiness” or “blessedness” in commonly used fields (abstract, title and keywords) The English database ISI web of science, Science Direct (Elsevier), Springer link and Google scholar was searched and the study area was limited to “China”. From the establishment of the library to July 15, 2015, the randomized controlled trials in our country of group counseling on intervention of college students’ subjective well-being. According to the established inclusion and exclusion criteria screening documents, data extraction, quality evaluation, the use of Revman 5.3 software and Stata software for meta-analysis. Results A total of 12 articles were included and 708 were tested, including 336 in the intervention group and 372 in the control group. Meta-analysis showed that subjective well-being in the intervention group was significantly higher than that in the control group (SMD = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.71 to 1.02, P <0.01); there was no significant difference in subjective well-being between the intervention group and the immediate grade = -0.16, 95% CI = -0.35-0.03, P = 0.09). Sensitivity analysis shows that no single study has a substantial effect on the results of the analysis. Conclusion Positive group counseling can improve college students’ subjective well-being and provide an evidence-based basis for active group counseling for college students.