论文部分内容阅读
现代刑事证明标准是衡量裁判者内心主观信念程度的标尺,是主观范畴。我国刑事证明标准从确立之初就选择了客观化的立场,以实事求是对抗自由心证,以客观验证代替裁判者内心的主观信念程度,形成了刑事证明标准的印证化。由“供证一致”到印证规则的法定化,我国的印证规则体系日益规范、细化。但刑事证明标准的印证化掩盖了事实认定过程的主观性,虚化了证明标准的制度功能,异化了印证证据分析方法的运用,加剧了庭审证明的形式化,最终影响了我国刑事诉讼制度的合理构建。以审判为中心的诉讼制度改革为我国刑事证明标准的主观转向提供了事实基础和程序保障,未来应把印证规则与刑事证明标准相剥离,确立并强化排除合理怀疑证明标准的地位及其应用,并明确印证作为证据分析方法的功能及走向。
The standard of modern criminal proof is to measure the degree of subjective belief in the referee’s inner yardstick, is the subjective category. The standard of criminal proof in our country has chosen the objectified position from the beginning of its establishment, with the purpose of seeking truth from facts, opposing the freedom, substituting objective judgment with the subjective belief of the judge, forming the proof of criminal proof standard. By “” for the same "to prove the legalization of the rules, the rules of our proof system is increasingly standardized, detailed. However, the proof of criminal proof standard obscures the subjectivity of the process of factual verification, defuses the system function of proof standard, alienates the application of proof evidence analysis method, exacerbates the formalization of trial proof and finally affects the criminal procedure system of our country Reasonable construction. The trial-centered reform of the litigation system provides the factual basis and procedural guarantee for the subjective shift of criminal proof standards in our country. In the future, the rules of proof should be separated from the standards of criminal proof, and the position and application of the reasonable doubtful proof should be established and strengthened. And clearly confirm the function and trend as evidence analysis method.