浅议无效合同的仲裁(诉讼)时效问题

来源 :仲裁研究 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:charles8025
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
《合同法》中对于无效合同是否受诉讼时效限制没有作出相应规定,从而造成理论派和务实派之间对此争论不休,在司法实践过程中适用的标准也不一致。结合最近最高人民法院《关于无效合同所涉诉讼时效问题的规定》(征求意见稿),本文拟论述确认合同无效请求权是否受诉讼时效的限制,并进一步探讨合同无效后的财产返还请求权是否受诉讼时效限制,及若适用诉讼时效如何确认起算点的问题,通过该文笔者意在对无效合同的处理起到抛砖引玉的作用。 There is no corresponding stipulation in the Contract Law whether the invalid contract is limited by the limitation of action, which leads to the endless debate between the theoretical school and the pragmatic school and the inconsistent standards in the judicial practice. Combined with the recent Supreme People's Court, “Provisions on the Limitation of Litigation over Invalid Contract” (Draft for Comment), this article discusses whether to confirm the contract invalid claims are subject to limitation of action, and to further explore whether the right to return the contract after the property claims are Subject to the limitations of the limitation of action and how to confirm the starting point if the applicable limitation of action expired. Through this article, the author intends to play a valuable role in the handling of the invalid contract.
其他文献
赢得顾客,是企业赢得市场之本。应当怎样去赢得顾客呢?笔者以为,须首先赢得“过客。”  泰国一位酒商曾别出心裁地在曼谷繁华的大街上造了一个小木屋,四周打上个小圆孔,并挂上一块写着“不准偷看”四字的醒目标牌,诱发过往行人的逆反之心,策划者越是不让偷看,行人们越是想看个明白。结果引来了无数的“过客”,通过小圆孔扫描看到的是“美酒飘香,请君品尝”的诱人字样,而偷看时鼻子所处的位置,又恰好是一坛敞开的美酒,