论文部分内容阅读
在司法审判实践中,对于毁损作品唯一载体行为各法院认识不同,判决结果相矛盾。本文从一般侵权法、现行著作权法规定以及著作权法理论、侵权法理论域外法研究等不同角度对该问题进行了探索研究,认为损毁作品唯一载体既构成对著作权人著作权的侵害,也构成对作品载体物的侵害,其应当属于责任聚合。并对我国正在进行的著作权法修改提出了建议。
In judicial trial practice, the judgments are contradictory to the different cognitions of the courts that destroy the only carrier of works. This article explores the issue from the perspectives of the general tort law, the current copyright law, the copyright law theory and the tort law theory extraterritorial law. It considers that the only carrier of the damaged works not only infringes the copyright of the copyright owner, Carrier infringement, it should belong to the responsibility of polymerization. And put forward suggestions on the revision of the ongoing copyright law in our country.