我国《合同法》第七十三条规定:“因债务人怠于行使其到期债权,对债权人造成损害的,债权人可以向人民法院请求以自己的名义代位行使债务人的债权,但该债权专属于债务人自身的除外。”而对于代位权的客体范围,《合同法解释一》将其限定为“具有金钱给付内容的到期债权”。但在实践中,随着司法案件的需要,地方法院根据具体案情,慢慢将非金钱内容为标的的债权纳入到代位权客体范围之内,而我国法学界对债权人代位权的客体范围一直存在争议。鉴 Article 73 of China’s “Contract Law” stipulates: “If the debtor lacks the exercise of his due claims and causes damage to the creditors, the creditors may request the people’s court to exercise their debtor’s claims in their own names, Except for the debtor itself. ”For the subject matter of subrogation, however,“ Contract Law Interpretation 1 ”limits it to“ expired debt with money to pay ”. However, in practice, along with the needs of judicial cases, local courts gradually bring the non-monetary content as the subject of claims into the object of subrogation according to the specific case, and the scope of the object of law in our jurisprudence to subrogation of creditors has always existed dispute. Kam