论文部分内容阅读
证人证言是新《刑事诉讼法》规定的八种法定证据之一,在诉讼中具有极其重要的作用,能作为认定案件事实甚至是案件主要事实的根据。证人证言属于言词证据的一种,因此它必然受到证人的主观和身处的客观条件影响,使其具有易变性的缺陷。因此,讨论证人证言的证明效力很有必要。但在司法实践中,侦查机关存在通过非常规方式获取证人证言的情况。对于此种情况下获取的证人证言的效力如何?本文从新《刑事诉讼法》规定常规取证的本意和完善非常规取证的方式两个方面,谈谈个人的一些看法。
Witness testimony is one of the eight kinds of statutory evidence stipulated in the new Code of Criminal Procedure. It plays an extremely important role in litigation and serves as the basis for determining the facts of the case and even the major facts of the case. Witness’s testimony belongs to a kind of verbal evidence, so it must be subject to the objective conditions of the witness’s subjectivity and living, making it has the flaw of variability. Therefore, it is necessary to discuss the validity of witness testimony. However, in the judicial practice, the investigating organ has the situation of obtaining witness testimony by unconventional means. How effective is the witness testimony obtained under such circumstances? This article from the new “Criminal Procedure Law” provides the purpose of the conventional evidence-taking and perfecting the way of unconventional evidence collection, to talk about some personal views.