论文部分内容阅读
生活质量理论和社会质量理论都采用社会指标进行社会测量,但其方法和侧重点各有不同。生活质量理论的视野有助于我们了解人们的生活状况及其水平的提高,而社会质量理论的视角则能够帮助我们认识社会结构和社会体系的特点。基于亚洲社会质量研究联合会所进行的社会调查数据,从这两个视野同时对资料展开分析,展示这两个理论在方法论上所具有的差异和特点,可以看出,我们在强调社会质量理论的运用时,不能低估生活质量所具有的政策意义。同时,由于中国正在经历着快速的收入差距的扩大,倡导社会质量理论对于我们提升社会和谐程度、增进人民福祉,具有直接的现实意义。所以,两种理论的导向和分析方法是相互补充而不是相互排斥的。
Both the quality of life theory and social quality theory use social indicators for social measurement, but the methods and focuses are different. The quality of life theory horizons help us to understand people’s living conditions and the level of improvement, while the perspective of social quality theory can help us understand the characteristics of social structure and social system. Based on the data from the social survey conducted by the Asian Association for the Study of Social Quality, we analyze the data from these two fields of vision at the same time and show the differences in methodologies between the two theories. We can see that we emphasize the theory of social quality When applied, the policy implications of quality of life can not be underestimated. At the same time, as China is experiencing a rapid expansion of its income gap, it is of immediate practical significance to advocate the theory of social quality for us to enhance social harmony and enhance people’s well-being. Therefore, the guiding and analyzing methods of the two theories are complementary rather than mutually exclusive.