论文部分内容阅读
当代对科学的反思主要有三种取向,即捍卫科学的辩护,质疑科学的批判,以及省视科学的审度。为科学辩护与批判科学的倾向往往在激烈较量中趋向极端,这种畸形的局面终于导致向所谓审度立场的转换。审度为全面、深入地认识科学提供了一条恰当路径;尤其对那些易于在两极间摇摆、迫切需要真正树立科学精神的国人,这种清醒的科学反思是当下极为合适的选择。
There are mainly three kinds of contemporary reflections on science: safeguarding the defense of science, questioning the criticism of science, and reducing the scrutiny of science. The tendency to defend and criticize science for science tends to be extreme in fierce battles and this deformity eventually leads to a shift to the so-called trial position. Auditing provides a proper path for a comprehensive and in-depth understanding of science. This sober scientific reflection, especially for those who are prone to swing between the two poles and urgently need to truly establish a scientific spirit, is an extremely appropriate choice at the moment.