论文部分内容阅读
康德在对传统的一般形而上学进行批判时,划定了人类理性的认识范围,人们超出这种规定性所认识到的形而上学的对象是“诡辩的假科学”;马克思的哲学革命为人们研究和批判的对象划定了界限,即以人的实践为前提的人类自然,若跨越这一界限去探寻在人之外的纯粹自然,则会陷入形而上学的困境。但是康德的形而上学批判与马克思的哲学革命又有所不同,康德是以不可知论和二元论为出发点以建立新的道德形而上学为归宿,而马克思则要抛弃任何先验的和超验的形而上学,可见,马克思对康德的超越之处。
When Kant criticized the traditional general metaphysics, he delimited the range of understanding of human rationality. The object of metaphysics recognized by people beyond this stipulation is “the sophistry of sophistry”; Marx’s philosophical revolution is the study of people And the object of criticism delimit the boundary, that is to say, human nature, which is premised on the practice of man, would fall into the plight of metaphysics if it is to search for pure nature beyond this boundary. However, Kant’s critique of metaphysics is different from Marx’s philosophical revolution. Kant flies from the point of agnosticism and dualism to the establishment of a new moral metaphysics. However, Marx abandons any transcendental and transcendental metaphysics. Thus, The Surpassing of Kant to Kant.