论文部分内容阅读
法律论证作为一种重要的法律方法,是司法民主的一种体现,在多方的参与下既可以提高判决的正确性,也可以提高判决的可接受性。然而由于利益、观点、立场等差异的现实存在,争议的当事人之间是否真的能达成共识或者哪怕是妥协、其他共同体是否能对案件的看法达成一致受到了质疑。现实中也确实存在未能取得良好社会效果的判决,但归根结底这是法律方法运用不当或者受到案外因素影响的结果,通过法律方法的学习、法律思维的构建、法律制度的整合可以在最大程度上解决这些问题。
As an important legal method, legal argumentation is an embodiment of judicial democracy. Under the multi-party participation, both the correctness of judgments and the acceptability of judgments can be improved. However, due to the reality of the differences in interests, opinions and positions, whether the parties to the dispute can really reach a consensus or even compromise will be questioned whether other communities can agree on the case. In reality, there are indeed judgments that fail to achieve good social effects. However, in the final analysis, this is the result of improper application of legal methods or the influence of extrajudicial factors. Through the study of legal methods, the construction of legal thinking and the integration of legal systems, solve these problems.