清代诗坛指责竟陵诗派为亡国诗妖、不学之诗,偏见之激、诋毁之急,彰示出清代诗坛上的诗学问题绝不是一个纯粹的学术理论问题。少数独具慧眼的诗人学者对竟陵诗派做出了公正的评价,但他们的声音在一片指责竟陵诗风的主流舆论声中细若游丝。清代诗坛对竟陵诗派批评的偏激使得自身矫枉过正,偏失难免,对竟陵诗派的艺术精髓不敢公开传承;清代诗坛折入学人之诗的道路,好以金石考据等学问入诗;歌时颂圣的高格响调在一定程度上造成乾嘉诗坛的虚肥啴缓之气。 In the Qing Dynasty, the poetic circles of the Qing Dynasty criticized the Lingling School as the poem, the poem without school, the prejudice and the slander urgently demonstrated that the issue of poetics in the Qing poetic world was by no means a purely academic issue. A few discerning poet scholars made a fair evaluation of the Jingling school of poetry, but their voices were subtitled in the mainstream media criticism of the poetic style. Qing Dynasty poetic criticism of the genre of Ling Lin Ling makes it overkill, missed the inevitable, on the Jingling poetic art’s essence is not openly inheritance; Qing poetic literary circles into the poet’s path, Poetry; singing song Shenggonggonggong tone to a certain extent, resulting in dry Jia poetic circles vanity Chi slow gas.