论文部分内容阅读
目的:比较手术流产与药物流产的成效,调查两种方式临床可接受情况和影响因素,为医院开展终止妊娠工作提供参考。方法:对在浙江省衢州市妇幼保健院经行手术流产与药物流产的120例早孕者临床资料进行回顾性分析,每种方式各60例,通过问卷,调查两组就终止妊娠手段的接受情况。结果:早孕者通过手术流产的成功率较药物流产要高(P<0.05),但通过药物流产的孕妇其紧张程度与痛苦程度等心理情况显著高于手术流产孕妇(P<0.05)。结论:早孕患者对流产方式没有特别要求,两种流产方式的接受程度相近,建议在保证手术安全的情况下,尊重患者的选择,提高患者的满意度。
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of surgical abortion and medical abortion, investigate the clinical acceptability and influencing factors in two ways, and provide reference for the hospital to terminate the pregnancy. Methods: The clinical data of 120 cases of early pregnancy who underwent surgical abortion and medical abortion in Quzhou Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Zhejiang Province were analyzed retrospectively, 60 cases in each way. Through the questionnaire, the acceptance of termination of pregnancy was investigated in both groups . Results: The success rate of pregnancy induced abortion was higher than that of medical abortion (P <0.05). However, the psychological status of pregnant women who passed medical abortion was significantly higher than that of surgical abortion (P <0.05). Conclusion: There are no special requirements for abortion in early pregnant women. The two methods of abortion are similar to each other. It is suggested that patients should be respected and patient satisfaction should be improved while ensuring the safety of operation.