近年来,有不少理论家和收藏家致力于散布这样一种观点:一件书画艺术品,是否有艺术价值和收藏价值,决定于它的创作方式。“复制”的,和“流水线式操作”的作品是对艺术的亵渎,是没有艺术价值的,当然也是没有收藏价值的。反之,“原创”的或“即兴式操作”的作品,是否就一定有艺术的价值?有收藏价值?他们没有说,但言下 In recent years, many theorists and collectors have devoted themselves to disseminating the idea that whether a calligraphy and painting artwork has artistic value or collectible value depends on its mode of creation. “Copy ”, and “Pipeline ” work is a desecration of art, there is no artistic value, of course, there is no collection value. On the contrary, whether the works of “original ” or “improvisational operation ” must have the value of art or the value of collection? They did not say that,