论文部分内容阅读
从美国法中的“毒树之果”规则的演进以及“沃沦法院”时期的宪法判例看,是否排除“毒果”要视“毒树”与“毒果”之间的因果关系而定。德国的证据禁止规则包括证据取得之禁止与证据使用之禁止,证据取得之禁止与证据使用之禁止都可以产生放射效力,其“假设的侦查”理论与美国判例观点相似。我国引入“毒树之果”规则具有一定的可行性,可以从刑讯逼供来寻找改革的突破点,赋予法院排除“毒果”的权力,我国法院应当运用平衡理论来审查衍生证据与违法证据间的因果关系。
From the evolution of the “fruit of the poison tree” rule in the United States law and the constitutional precedent in the “Woolen Court” period, whether the exclusion of “poisonous fruit” depends on the “poisonous tree” and the “poisonous” Fruit “depending on the causal relationship between. German Prohibition Prohibition rules include the prohibition of the acquisition of evidence and the prohibition on the use of evidence, the prohibition on the acquisition of evidence and the prohibition on the use of evidence can all produce radiological validity. The ”hypothetical investigation“ theory is similar to the view of the U.S. jurisprudence. The introduction of the ”fruit of poison tree“ rule in our country has some feasibility. We can find a breakthrough point of reform through confession by torture and give the court the power to exclude ”poisonous fruit". Our country’s courts should use the theory of balance to examine the derivative evidence Causation relationship with illegal evidence.