论文部分内容阅读
《荀子·性恶》篇之“伪”字皆具理性人为义,《荀子·性恶》篇“綦”字又为“极”之假借,这两种现象是其他先秦秦汉文献所没有的,而仅见于《荀子》一书,当为荀子作品的区别性特征。由《荀子》书“伪”、“綦”两字的这种特殊用法看,否定《性恶》篇为荀子之作是没有理由的,《性恶》篇当为荀子的代表作。
“Xunzi Sexual Evil” articles of the “pseudo” characters are rational human righteousness, “Xunzi Sexual Evil” articles “綦 ” Word and “pole ” of the borrowing, these two phenomena are other pre-Qin Qin and Han literature does not have, but only found in “Xunzi” a book, as a distinctive feature of Xunzi’s works. From the special usage of the two words “Xunzi”, “pseudo” and “Xunzi”, it is not justified to negate “sex and evil” as Xunzi’s works. .