论文部分内容阅读
在其传世之作《最不危险的部门》中,比克尔断言:“司法审查是反民主的(undemocratic)。”自此以后,“反多数难题”就成为了困扰司法审查的噩梦。尽管法院也曾试图以积极的姿态去捍卫正义和人权,但每当此时总会有清醒而理智的学者(包括法官)站出来,提醒法院注意自己“反民主”的不足。而如何解决这一难题也就成为了宪法
In his most not-to-be-dangerous piece, Bikel asserted: “Judicial review is an undemocratic.” “Antipolynous problems” have since become a blessing on judicial review Nightmare Although the courts have also tried to defend justice and human rights in a positive manner, whenever there is always a sober-minded and scholar (including a judge) standing up to remind the court of their own inadequacies of “anti-democracy.” How to solve this problem has also become the constitution