法官在司法判决书中的释法说理、说服论证不仅存在于裁判理由中,对事实的叙述也同样隐性地存在着,甚至在某种程度上事实叙述中的说服论证更具有令人信服的说服力。我国法官通过司法判决书进行最初也是最终的论证和说服,法官对判决书中的法律事实的修辞是法官进行说服和论证的重要方面,但法官在对法律事实认定进行修辞时应防止修辞的恣意,审慎地对待被修辞包装的事实。 Judges interpretations of legal judgments in judicial decisions, persuasion argumentation not only exists in the referee grounds, the same factual narrative also exists implicitly, even to some extent, the factual argument persuasion argument more convincing persuasion force. Judges judge the persuasion and argumentation in judging the legal facts in the verdict as the first and final argument and persuasion of the judiciary in our country. However, the judge should prevent rhetorical arbitrary and prudent Treat the fact that rhetorical packaging.