论文部分内容阅读
在十年前(1986)我曾写过一篇关于清代《红楼梦》评点派的文章,题为《重议评点派》,发表在《红楼梦学刊》1987年第一期。同时我又辑录了清代八家著名《红楼梦》评点派的全部评语,以程甲本为底本,依原评位置排印,书名为《八家评批红楼梦》,于1991年由文化艺术出版社出版。《重议评点派》就是该书的叙言。 我在这篇文章里提出了:一、重新评价清代的红学评点派,应该肯定他们的研究成果;二、具体地列举了十一个红学重大专题,都是评点派早已研究并提出了正确的或接近正确的看法的;三,我指出评点是传统的文艺批评方式,这种方式是可取的,行之有效的。有些人评点得不好,并不是这种方式不好,而是评点的人本身水平的问题。最后我呼吁说:
Ten years ago (1986), I wrote an article about the critics of the “Dream of Red Mansions” during the Qing dynasty, titled “Reviewing and Evaluating School” published in the first issue of A Dream of Red Mansions 1987. At the same time, I also recorded all the comments of eight famous “Dream of Red Mansions” critics in the Qing Dynasty. The book was titled “Eight Criticisms of A Dream of Red Mansions,” published by Cheng Jiaben in 1991 and published by Culture and Arts Publishing House in 1991 . “Re-comment on the school” is the book’s statement. I put forward in this article: First, to re-evaluate the Red School Review School in Qing Dynasty, we should confirm their research results; Second, specifically listed eleven red-key major topics, are the commentaries have long been studied and put forward the correct Or close to the correct view; Third, I pointed out that the criticism is the traditional literary criticism, this approach is desirable and effective. Some people comment badly, not this way is not good, but the point of the people themselves. Finally, I called for: