论文部分内容阅读
普惠制给惠国经常对适格受惠国设置一定条件,事实上形成对发展中国家的分类和普惠制差别待遇,其合法性存在诸多争议。世贸组织争端解决机构关于“印度诉欧共体毒品安排案”的裁决表明,差别待遇的合法性取决于差别待遇实施的标准是否符合GATT第1条第1款或GATT 1971年授权条款。某些西方国家学者所主张的发展中国家分类对有竞争力的发展中国家十分不利,对中国尤其如此。中国应当旗帜鲜明地反对对WTO发展中国家成员进行分类。
The GSP countries often set certain conditions for the beneficiary countries. In fact, there is a lot of controversy over the legality of the classification and GSP systems for developing countries. The WTO Dispute Settlement Body’s ruling on “India v EC Drugs Arrest” shows that the legality of differential treatment depends on whether the criteria for the implementation of differential treatment are in compliance with Article 1, paragraph 1, of the GATT or the terms of the 1971 GATT authorization. The classification of developing countries advocated by some western countries scholars is very unfavorable to the competitive developing countries, especially to China. China should clearly oppose the classification of WTO developing country members.