论文部分内容阅读
《左傳》言及《詩經》篇目有分章,阜陽漢簡《詩經》分章抄寫,至《毛傳》,開始標出《詩經》每一篇的章數句數。《鄭箋》對此略有改動,而朱子《詩集傳》對毛、鄭的分章斷句亦略有改動。據統計,《詩集傳》對毛、鄭的分章作出改動的有12篇,斷句作出改動的有3篇。朱子的這15處改動,有些比較合理,有些也存在問題。然而,我們不能只是從純粹文獻學的角度來審視這一問題。《毛傳》、《鄭箋》在分章斷句上有不合理之處,朱子對其作出調整,是爲可以恢復到先秦時期《詩經》文本原貌而作出的努力與嘗試。
“Zuo Zhuan” and “The Book of Songs,” there are chapters chapters, the Han Dynasty, Fuyang, “The Book of Songs” sub-chapter copy, to “Mao Biography”, began to mark “The Book of Songs,” the number of chapters. “Zheng Jian,” a slight change on this, and Zhu “Poems Biography” Mao, Zheng’s subdivision sentence slightly changed. According to statistics, there are 12 articles in the “Biography of Poetry” made to Mao and Zheng’s chapters, and 3 articles were made to make changes. Zhu changes in these 15, some more reasonable, some also have problems. However, we can not examine this issue simply from a purely philological perspective. Mao Tse-tung and Zheng Jian had unreasonable points in punctuated sentences and Zhu made adjustments to them. They are attempts and attempts to restore the original text of The Book of Songs to the pre-Qin period.