论文部分内容阅读
国际商事仲裁裁决既判力的作用与民事判决既判力的作用相似,具有内容层面上对后诉案件的拘束作用,以及程序层面上对后诉案件的一事不再理作用。然而,由于国际商事仲裁裁决既判力问题的复杂性,在仲裁地与诉讼地位于不同国家、或者仲裁庭之间就管辖权发生争议的情况下,既判力的上述作用将很难发挥。遵循先例原则与既判力虽有区别,但也具有密切联系,具有先例地位的仲裁裁决对后诉案件具有劝导性的效力。
The function of res judicata in international commercial arbitration ruling is similar to the function of res judicata in civil judgment, which has the restraining effect on the latter case on the content level and the procedural level does not make any use of the latter case. However, due to the complex nature of the res judicata in international commercial arbitral awards, the aforementioned effect of res judicata will be very difficult to play in the event of a dispute over jurisdiction between the place of arbitration and the place of the proceedings in different countries or the arbitral tribunal. Follow the precedent principle and the res judicata although there are differences, but also have close ties, the precedent of the arbitration award has the persuasive effect on the latter case.