论文部分内容阅读
都说学生是学校的主人,可现实的状况却是,他们是身处学校管理者和教师的高压下的最无助的弱势群体。案例中作者的自得心理溢于言表:学生违反了校纪,老师格外开恩,最后因了老师的包容,逃脱了规则的处罚,受教育权得以维护,最后这种教育方式取得了良好的效果:学生高考取得了好成绩。但是,从这个“正面的”教育案例中,我们看到的恰恰是教育者对学生权利的漠视与剥夺。1.不合理的规则,不公正的程序。“私自上网,就要被停课一个星期”。对学校的管理者和教师来讲,目的是想通过“严刑峻法”阻止学生的不良行为,可这样的处罚合理吗?停课一个
All say that students are the masters of the school. The reality is that they are the most helpless vulnerable people under the pressure of school administrators and teachers. In the case, the autobiographical psychology of the author was overwhelmed: the student violated the school discipline, the teacher was particularly grateful, and finally got the punishment of the rule due to the inclusion of the teacher, and was protected by the right to education. Finally, this kind of education achieved good results: Achieved good results. However, from this “positive” education case, what we see is precisely the indifference and deprivation of the rights of students by educators. 1. Irrational rules, unfair procedures. “Private Internet, will be suspended for a week.” For the school administrators and teachers, the purpose is to pass the “severe law” to stop the student’s bad behavior, can such a punishment be reasonable?