论文部分内容阅读
在三代历史的研究中,学者一直面临着如何整合文献、金文和考古资料的困境~([1])。无论具体的某位学者是否同意这种困境的存在,但从宏观上来看这三种资料之间的不重合甚或矛盾是客观存在的。这种情况既存在于历史学界和考古学界之间,也存在于考古学者之间。笔者在对洛阳地区西周时期的资料进行研究时,深感这种情况尤为突出,故不揣鄙陋,在此试对关于成周、洛邑、王城的讨论进行简单的分析。
In the study of the three generations of history, scholars have been facing the dilemma of how to integrate literature, gold texts and archeological materials. ([1]). Regardless of whether a particular scholar agrees on the existence of such a dilemma, it is an objective reality that there is no overlap or contradiction between these three kinds of information from a macro point of view. This situation exists both in history and archeology, but also among archaeologists. When I studied the materials of the Western Zhou Dynasty in Luoyang, I deeply felt that this situation was particularly prominent. Therefore, I did a brief analysis of the discussion about Cheng Zhou, Luo Yi and Wang Cheng.