论文部分内容阅读
我们常常会用文豪肖伯纳的“两个苹果与两种思想”的理论来强调思想交流的重要性。相比之下,每一次课堂教学大赛则是一次能量不小的思想大爆炸。本人从教将近十年,与省课堂教学大赛结缘不小。当过选手,亲历过绞尽脑汁的艰辛“磨”课,并在多次反思修改后收获过骄人的战果。也曾应邀作为一名“屌丝级”评委全程近距离地聆听专家评委们的真知灼见。在“当局者”与“旁观者”的角色转换中反思和成长,感叹于课堂教学艺术的博大精深。在见贤思齐心理的驱使下,恨不能把
We often emphasize the importance of exchange of ideas with writer George Bernard Shaw’s theory of “two apples and two thoughts.” In contrast, each classroom teaching contest is a big energy explosion of ideas. I teach from nearly ten years, and the provincial classroom teaching competition no small affair. After being a runner, he has experienced the arduous “grind” lesson and rewarded the impressive success after many revisions. Has also been invited as a “reeling level ” judges throughout the expert hearing heard the expert advice. In the role of “authorities ” and “bystander ” reflection and growth, sigh in the classroom teaching art profound. Driven by meekness and wisdom, I can not wait