论文部分内容阅读
从严格意义上讲，企业家作为一个阶层产生于两权分离。所有权与经营权的分离，经历了从股权逐渐弱化到经营权日渐强化的演变过程，大致分为三个阶段。与两权分离三阶段相联系，企业家利益激励也经历了支薪制、支薪制为主体与剩余分享为补充、剩余分享制为主体三种形式的演变。支薪制与分享制相比较，后者是对企业家实行激励的基本方式，对它所体现的优越性也使其成为最优的选择方式。那么，能否由企业家独占企业剩余的问题，文章从理论和现实两方面作出了否定的回答
In a strict sense, entrepreneurs as a class arise from the separation of powers. Separation of ownership and management has undergone a gradual evolution from the gradually weakened shareholding to the enhancement of franchise rights, which is roughly divided into three stages. In connection with the three phases of separation of rights, entrepreneurial interest incentives have undergone three forms of evolution: pay system, pay system as the main body and surplus sharing as the supplement, and the remaining share system as the main body. Pay system and share system compared to the latter is the basic way of implementing incentives for entrepreneurs, the superiority it reflects also makes it the optimal choice. So, whether the problem can be left over by the entrepreneur exclusive enterprise, the article made a negative answer both in theory and reality