一段时期以来,档案苑里展开了优化馆藏的讨论,全国各级档案刊物为此刊登了不少优化馆藏的文章。去年《中国档案》第三期还刊登了《长期档案进馆与档案保管期限二分法》的文章。这些文章多数观点是把馆藏的臃肿归咎于接收长期档案进馆,把馆藏的庞杂归咎于档案保管期限“三分法”等等。为求共识,笔者对上述各种观点特作如下评析,恳请同仁指正。 观点之一,长期档案进馆是因为当时馆藏家底不厚,为充实馆藏而接收长期档案进馆,现在家底厚 Since a certain period of time, Archives Court has started discussions on the optimization of collections, and archival publications at various levels have published many articles on the optimization of collections. Last year, the third issue of “China Archives” also published an article titled “Dichotomy of Long-term Archives into the Museum and Archiving Period”. Much of the argument in these articles is to blame the cumbersome collection on receiving long-term files into the museum, attributing the complexity of the collection to the “trisection” of the file’s shelf life. For the sake of consensus, I make the following special comments on the above views, and urge my colleagues to correct me. Point of view, long-term archives into the museum because the collectors at the end is not thick, to enrich the collection and receive long-term files into the museum, and now thick at home