过去有的学者把孔子反对季孙“以田赋”，视之为其站在奴隶主势力反对新兴的封建势力的例证之一，实则不然。从“以田赋”的内容看，是把原本“有军旅之出则征之”，征时不过“收田一井，出■米、秉刍、缶米”，制度化为无军旅之出之岁也征之，并以田亩为征收标准的固定战争实物费。季孙坚决执行“以田赋”，有其重要的时代背景，即连年的征战。孔子坚决反对“以田赋”，只从道德角度考量，而未从鲁国所面临的具体问题出发，同其是否维护奴隶制毫无关系。 In the past, some scholars saw Confucius as opposed to the “grandchildren” of the field with “grandchildren” as one of the examples of its standing against the new forces of the feudal forces and feudalism, but it is not. Judging from the content of “Tia Fu”, the original “there is a military out of the levy,” but at the time of requisition, but “harvesting a well, out of rice, Bing Chu, Mi rice,” institutionalized as the age of no military brigade Also levied, and Tian Mu as a standard fixed-rate physical warfare. The monarchy and the cadres resolutely implement the “grant Tian Fu”, has its important background of the times, that year after year campaign. Confucius firmly opposes the “tax concessions” only from a moral point of view, without starting from the specific problems faced by the country of Luguo, it has nothing to do with its maintenance of slavery.