论文部分内容阅读
在我国,现行的政府信息公开法律法规中并无“公众预算知情权”的明确表述。就法理而言,知悉政府预算信息是人民依据《宪法》第2条行使当家作主权力的应有之义。公众预算知情权可以细分为实体权利和程序权利,尤其是程序权利具有举足轻重的关键意义。然而,在目前政府预算信息公开制度框架下,主张预算知情权的实体权利时公众将可能面临四大程序法律约束制度,即程序权利不完整、“特殊需要”举证责任、敏感政府预算账户科目缺失和国家秘密行政自由裁定制度。要推进政府预算信息公开事业的深入发展,须继续修改相关法律法规,有针对性地逐一消除上述四大程序法律障碍,从而确保公众预算知情权能够切实地从“纸面上的权利”转化为“行动中的权利”。
In our country, the current laws and regulations on the disclosure of government information do not contain the explicit expression “the public’s right to information about the public budget”. As far as jurisprudence is concerned, knowing the budget information of the government is the proper meaning of people exercising their rights as masters of their own affairs in accordance with Article 2 of the Constitution. The public’s right to information and publicity can be subdivided into substantive and procedural rights, and in particular procedural rights have pivotal significance. However, under the framework of the current system of government budget information disclosure, the public will be confronted with four major procedural laws when it comes to the substantive rights of the budgetary right to information, namely, the procedural rights are not complete and the burden of proof for “special needs”, the sensitive government budget account Deletion of subjects and state discretionary administrative freedom adjudication system. In order to promote the further development of the government budget information publicity, we must continue to revise the relevant laws and regulations and eliminate all the above four major procedural legal obstacles in a targeted manner so as to ensure that the public’s budgetary right to information can effectively be read from the “right on paper” Translate into “rights in action”.