对定牌加工中以注意义务判定侵权方式的反思

来源 :中华商标 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:zkinchow
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
定牌加工是否构成商标侵权,一直存在争议。但通常问题集中在贴牌是否属于商标法意义上的使用,商标权的地域性,以及定牌加工是否会导致商品来源混淆等问题上。但随着司法实践的发展,定牌加工侵权认定中出现了新的思路与方法,最为典型的就是通过审查加工企业的注意义务,判断定牌加工是否构成侵权。以“注意义务”作为侵权判定的方式,改变了通常侵权的认定方法,对此如何理解,笔者对此进行简要分析。 Whether brand processing constitutes trademark infringement has been controversial. However, the problems usually lie in whether the use of the label belongs to the trademark law, the geographical nature of the trademark rights and whether the brand processing will lead to the confusion of the sources of goods. However, with the development of judicial practice, new ideas and methods have emerged in the identification of trademark-processing infringement. The most typical one is to judge whether the brand-name processing constitutes infringement through reviewing the duty of attention of processing enterprises. To “pay attention to duty” as a way to determine the infringement changed the way to determine the usual infringement, how to understand it, I make a brief analysis of this.
其他文献
维护消费者权益是一个永恒的话题。一年一度的“3.15”消费者维权日,更是一场对商家的全民监督。维护消费者权益是一个永恒的话题。浦东的消费者维权途径有哪些?浦东消保委如