论文部分内容阅读
劳丹通过对一些历史实例的分析表明,以所谓“均变论者”的眼光来看待方法论史,认为科学哲学的过去与现在处于同样的若干因素影响之下,那么将无法获得对于科学哲学和方法论的历史性认识。劳丹主张,应当回到科学史、从科学思想的变化中寻求方法论和科学哲学的变化,不应当一味从哲学史和认识论史中寻找科学哲学变化的源头。方法论史并不仅仅是认识论史的一个分支。
Laudan's analysis of some historical examples shows that looking at the history of methodology in the light of the so-called “avalancheist” thinks that the past and present of philosophy of science are under the influence of a number of factors, Historic Understanding of Philosophy and Methodology. Laudan advocated that he should return to the history of science and seek changes in methodology and philosophy of science from the changes of his scientific thinking. He should not blindly look for the source of changes in philosophy of science from the history of philosophy and epistemology. Methodological history is not just a branch of epistemological history.