论文部分内容阅读
Fungal infection is common in critically ill patients. However, this infection is difficult to diagnose, and alarge proportion of patients receive empirical antifungal treatment without further confirmation of invasive fungal disease. Whilst prompt appropriate antifungal treatment is associated with better outcome in patients with confirmed infections, this treatment has several drawbacks. In addition, no clear beneficial effect of empirical antifungal treatment was found in patients without confirmed infection. Reducing antifungal treatment in the intensive care unit(ICU) is feasible, and would allow avoiding drawbacks of this treatment without negative impact on outcome. Antifungal stewardship, preemptive antifungal treatment, based on colonization index and fungal biomarkers; and deescalation of antifungal treatment based on microbiology results and fungal biomarkers could be suggested to reduce antifungal use in the ICU, and are currently under investigation.
However, this infection is difficult to diagnose, and a large proportion of patients receive empirical antifungal treatment without further confirmation of invasive fungal disease. Whilst prompt appropriate antifungal treatment is associated with better outcome in patients with confirmed infections , this treatment has several drawbacks. In addition, no clear beneficial effect of empirical antifungal treatment was found in patients without confirmed infection. Reducing antifungal treatment in the intensive care unit (ICU) is feasible, and would allow no drawbacks of this treatment without negative impact on outcome. Antifungal stewardship, preemptive antifungal treatment, based on colonization index and fungal biomarkers; and deescalation of antifungal treatment based on microbiology results and fungal biomarkers could be suggested to reduce antifungal use in the ICU, and are currently under investigation.