论文部分内容阅读
文章格调 夏志清先生《中国现代小说史》,有偏见,亦有灼见。如论及茅盾先生,即认为“他还是从事当代文学批评最有眼光的一位。……最见功力,议论精到,读来亲切近人”。 惜躬逢“左拾遗”肆虐,健笔凌云的茅盾亦每每左支右绌,困不可忍。1963年为纪念曹雪芹逝世200周年,茅盾起草《关于曹雪芹》,却因“初稿不点名胡适”,又因“实在体会不出”“四大家族”之说的“更深的涵义”,等等,劳神焦思之状活现《致邵荃麟》信中。
The style of the article Mr. Xia Zhiqing “History of Modern Chinese Fiction,” biased, but also insightful. If we talk about Mr. Mao Dun, we think that “he is still the most insightful one in contemporary literary criticism.” Unfortunately, bow on the left pick left ravaged, Ken Lin Chong Lin Pencil also often left the deficit, sleepy intolerable. In 1963, in commemoration of the 200th anniversary of the death of Cao Xueqin, Mao Dun drafted the “deeper connotation” of “about Cao Xueqin” because “the first draft did not name Hu Shih” but also “really did not realize it” and “the four big families” Refining the status quo, “Shao Tsuen Lin” letter.