论文部分内容阅读
有这样两则案例 ,案情基本相同 ,时间稍有先后 ,其间法律、法规并无变动 ,但法院判案结果却大不相同 :甲例 :1 997年 4月 1 7日北京《邮政周报》刊登了一篇题为《为什么只能补偿十八元》的报导文章 ,文中的案例大意是 :“某地商业服务有限公司寄了一件发往广东惠东电子器材公司
There are two such cases. The merits are basically the same and the time is slightly different. In the meantime, laws and regulations have not changed. However, the outcome of the court judgment is very different: Case 1: The “Postal Weekly” of Beijing was released on April 17, 1997 An article entitled “why only 18 yuan compensation,” the article, the text of the case to the effect that: "Somewhere Commercial Services Co., Ltd. sent a letter to Guangdong Huidong Electronic Equipment Company