论文部分内容阅读
本文是对《〈简·爱〉的失败》(赵海虹,《外国文学》2004年第二期)的反驳。赵文认为,简·爱的离开与其归来都与财产有关,财产是简·爱的行为动机。而本文认为,赵文错把简的行为前提当作了行为动机,而忽略了婚姻与爱情也需要物质基础的事实。简·爱看重的并非财产,而是爱情的尊严与平等,而爱情主题本身也是小说的重要部分。简·爱没有失败。在《〈简·爱〉的失败》一文中,作者赵海虹提出:简·爱不能称得上是女性主义的先锋,简·爱
This article is a refutation of the failure of “Jane Eyre” (Zhao Haihong, “Foreign Literature”, Issue 2, 2004). Zhao Wen believes that the departure of Jane Eyre and its return are related to property, property is Jane Eyre’s motive. However, this article argues that Zhao Wenzou regarded the precondition of Jane’s behavior as a motive of behavior, while ignoring the fact that marriage and love also need material basis. Jane love is not valued property, but the dignity and equality of love, and the theme of love itself is an important part of the novel. Jane Love did not fail. In “The Failure of Jane Eyre”, author Zhao Haihong put forward: Jane Eyre can not be regarded as the vanguard of feminism, Jane Eyre