从表面看,法院的司法解释对公证工作并无直接的法律约束力。特别是刑事审判方面的司法解释,与以证明民事法律行为、有法律意义的事实和文书真实性合法性为己任的公证看似毫无瓜葛。正因为如此,实践中,公证工作者常常忽视或不关注司法解释(各级法院特别是省级法院具有指导意义的审判意见和建议也属于广义的司法解释,文中有些司法解释即指广义的司法解释)。笔者以为,公证员与法官同为法律职业共同体,公证员不应该仅仅局限 Judging from the surface, the judicial interpretation of the court has no direct legal binding on notarization. Judicial interpretation, especially in criminal trials, seems to have no connection with notarising notarization of the authenticity of the facts of civil law, legal fact and instrument. Because of this, in practice, the notary public often neglects or does not pay attention to the judicial interpretation (all levels of courts, especially provincial courts, which have guiding significance and judgment also belong to the broad sense of judicial interpretation. In the article, some judicial interpretations refer to broad judicial Explanation). I believe that notaries and judges with the legal profession community, notaries should not be limited