论文部分内容阅读
近读《寻找护“短”之道》(1992年第4期《新闻战线》)也深感太有护“短”之必要。对报纸上长而又令人不爱看的大块文章,不仅读者怨声载道,就连报界同仁也望之叹息。此类长文为何久禁不绝?除了《寻找护“短”之道》中所列举的下头的原因,还有上头甚至上上头的原因。一是管报之人有意发此类长文给上级领导看,以显示出报纸办得有分量。上切,下切,甚至“下转×版”。文章块大,标题也不能小,甚至是手写草书,格外醒目。之一,之二,甚至之五。似无
It is also necessary to read the short “way” (No. 4, 1992, “The News Front”) of “looking for help.” Not only do readers complain about the lengthy and dislikeable large articles in the newspapers, they even sigh for the newspaper colleagues. Why are these long essays forbidden? There is a reason, above and beyond, for the reasons cited in the Short Ways of Finding and Protecting. First, people who intend to send such lengthy articles to upper-level leaders intend to show that newspapers do have the weight. On the cut, cut under, and even “down × Edition.” Article block, the title can not be small, or even cursive handwriting, especially eye-catching. One, two, even five. Like nothing