论文部分内容阅读
在西方法理学发展历史中,哈特的历史地位是毋庸置疑的。自1961年出版以来,《法律的概念》([英]哈特:《法律的概念》第二版(以下简称的哈特书),许家馨、李冠宜译,法律出版社2011年第2版,第20-22页)所建构的理论框架对于法理学理论有着深远的影响。一、对法律命令说的批判奥斯丁的基本观点认为,准确意义上的法(laws)具有命令(commands)的性质,如果没有命令的性质,无论何种类型的法,自然不是准确意义上的法。哈特从对奥斯丁的命令理论的批
In the history of the development of western jurisprudence, Hart’s historical status is beyond doubt. Since its publication in 1961, “The concept of law” ([English] Hart: “The concept of law” second edition (hereinafter referred to as the Hart Book), Xu Jiaxin, translated by Li Guan Yi, Law Press, 2011 2nd edition, 20-22) The theoretical framework constructed has far-reaching implications for jurisprudence theory. I. Criticism of Legal Orders Austin’s basic point of view is that the exact laws of law have the nature of commands. Without the nature of an order, no matter what type of law is naturally not exactly Law. Hart got his approval from Austin’s command theory